Description of pulmonary propofol kinetics and of the influence of propofol on flow distribution with a recirculatory model
J.A. Kuipers, F. Boer, W. Olieman, A.G.L.
Burm, J.G.Bovill. Department of
Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden,The Netherlands
Background
Propofol
influences haemodynamics and possibly causes a re-distribution of blood flow.
The principal site of propofol elimination is the liver and thus diversion of
the flow from the liver could alter it’s hepatic elimination. Furthermore, the
clearance of propofol from the plasma exceeds hepatic blood flow and the lung
is thought to contribute to its elimination1. Both flow
re-distribution and pulmonary uptake or pulmonary elimination cannot be
identified with a classical 3-compartmental model. In this study we examined
the ability of a recirculatory model to identify propofol-induced flow
re-distribution and pulmonary propofol behaviour in sheep.
Methods
Ten sheep,
suspended in a hammock, with two semi-permanent catheters in the right internal
jugular vein for propofol and indocyanine green (ICG) injection and one in the
carotid artery for arterial sampling, received three injections of 25 mg ICG and one injection of 4 mg/kg propofol. The
first injection of ICG was given to describe the baseline parameters of the
circulation. The second ICG injection was given simultaneously with the
propofol injection for measurement of the intravascular recirculatory
parameters and to allow the identification of the lung compartment. A third ICG
injection at different times after propofol injection was given to measure the
influence of propofol on the intravascular parameters. The arterial
concentration-time curves of ICG were analysed with a recirculatory model2.
The parameters of the model of the first and third ICG injection were compared
with a paired t-test to identify propofol-induced flow re-distribution and
differences in distribution volumes. The pulmonary uptake and elimination of
propofol were analysed using the central part of the recirculatory model, which
for propofol included a pulmonary compartment from which propofol could be
eliminated (figure).
Results
Propofol
caused a significant (-24%) decrease of the cardiac output (table; values are
mean ± SD). In the
recirculatory model for ICG this decrease was accompanied by a significant
decrease of the flow to the fast compartment, maintenance of the flow to the
slow compartment and an increase in elimination clearance of ICG. The distribution of the total blood volume (Vss) over the
central and peripheral parts of the circulation was unaffected by propofol
administration. For propofol a pulmonary tissue compartment of 0.47 ±
0.16 litres was found. A significant amount of the propofol was eliminated in
the central part of the model which includes heart and lungs. During the
first-pass 30% of the bolus dose of propofol was eliminated in the lungs.
Parameters
|
Baseline
|
t = 13-30 min
|
|
CO (l/min) |
5.04 ± 0.76 |
3.85 ± 0.91* |
|
Clnd_f (l/min) |
3.00 ±
1.07 |
1.39 ±
0.79* |
|
Clnd_s
(l/min) |
1.08 ± 0.69 |
1.47 ± 1.13 |
|
Clel (l/min) |
0.79 ± 0.30 |
1.00 ± 0.29* |
|
Vss (l) |
2.24 ± 0.25 |
2.03 ± 0.45 |
|
Vcentral (l) |
0.67 ± 0.14 |
0.54 ± 0.10 |
|
Vnd_f (l) |
0.90 ± 0.40 |
0.51 ± 0.41 |
|
Vnd_s (l) |
0.67 ± 0.19 |
0.99 ± 0.52 |
*
Different from parameters at baseline, p<0.05 for paired t-test
Conclusions
The reduction
in cardiac output by propofol resulted in a decreased flow to the fast ICG
compartment, while the flow to the slow ICG compartment was maintained. It is
assumed that the splanchnic circulation, draining to the liver, belongs to the
slow non-distributive peripheral compartment. For propofol a large pulmonary
tissue compartment and extrahepatic elimination was identified. Recirculatory
modelling can be used to identify both drug-induced flow re-distribution and
pulmonary uptake and elimination.
References
1. Br. J Anaesth 68: 183-186, 1992
2. JPET 278: 1050-1057, 1996 .