The pharmacokinetic interaction between alfentanil and propofol in healthy male volunteers
M.J. Mertens,
J. Vuyk, E. Olofsen, A.G.L. Burm, J.G. Bovill, Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The
Netherlands
Background & goal of the study
The
pharmacodynamic interaction between alfentanil (ALF) and propofol (PROP) has
been described in detail. In contrast, very little is known on wether PROP also
affects the pharmacokinetics of ALF. We studied the effect of a
semi-steady-state concentration of PROP on the distribution and elimination of
ALF.
Material and methods
With
ethics committee approval and informed consent the pharmacokinetics of
alfentanil were studied in 8 healthy male volunteers in the absence and
presence of propofol in a randomized cross-over manner. While breathing 40% O2
in air, ALF 12.5 mg/kg, iv, was administered in 2 min, followed by 25 mg/kg/h
for 58 min (session A). With an interval of 3 weeks, the same ALF infusion
scheme was given in the presence of a target controlled infusion of PROP1
at a constant target PROP concentration of 1.5 mg/ml that was started 15 min
before and maintained up to 6 h after termination of the ALF infusion (session
B). The ECG, BP, RR, ET-CO2 and SaO2 were monitered
continuously. The ET-CO2 was maintained below 45 mmHg. Venous blood
samples for ALF and PROP determination were taken frequently during and up to 6
h after termination of the ALF infusion. The pharmacokinetics of alfentanil
were determined using the software package WINNONLIN and compared between
sessions A and B using the paired t-test.
Results and discussion
The
mean age and weight (± SD) of the volunteers were 24 ± 3 yr and 74 ± 6 kg.
The data was best fitted with a 2 compartment pharmacokinetic model. Lag time
was included in the model because of venous sampling.
Conclusion
Propofol
alters the pharmacokinetics of alfentanil, mainly during the initial
distribution. These differences might be explained by the difference in the
haemodynamic parameters in session A and B.
References
1. Anesth Analg 1987;66:12-1263
Table 1: The pharmacokinetic parameters of alfentanil and the heamodynamic parameters in the absence (session A) and in the presence (session B) of propofol
|
|
Session A |
Session B |
Difference
(%) |
P value |
|
V1 (ml/kg) |
191 ± 95 |
76 ± 23 |
-60 |
0.01 |
|
Vss (ml/kg) |
393 ± 81 |
42 ± 15 |
-89 |
0.18 |
|
Cl
(ml/kg/min) |
4.8 ± 1.5 |
3.9 ± 1.0 |
-19 |
0.07 |
|
Cld (ml/kg/min) |
9.4 ± 5.9 |
22.3 ±
24.9 |
137 |
0.19 |
|
t½ alpha |
7.9 ± 4.8 |
2.2 ± 0.8 |
-72 |
0.01 |
|
t½ beta |
70 ± 9 |
74 ± 14 |
6 |
0.03 |
|
lag time (s) |
109 ± 14 |
32 ± 35 |
-71 |
0.002 |
|
Cl (l/m2) |
3.28 ± 0.37 |
3.13 ± 0.38 |
-5 |
0.28 |
|
MAP (mmHg) |
81 ± 6 |
69 ± 5 |
-15 |
0.01 |
|
SVR
(dynes/s/m-5 ) |
1008 ± 107 |
908 ± 109 |
-10 |
0.05 |