Dae Woo Kim, MD, PhD,* Ho Yeong Kil,
MD, PhD,† Paul F. White, PhD, MD, FANZCA‡
*
Department of Anesthesiology, The Catholic University of Korea; † Hallym
University, Seoul, Korea; ‡ University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center at Dallas
Background and Goal of
Study: In a noisy hospital setting, it is not easy to
induce hypnosis or sedation calmly. Although the noise stress has been
neglected, it seems to disturb a patient's sleep or induction of sedation.
Therefore, we tried to evaluate the effects of loud operating room (OR)
background noise on bispectral index (BIS) during monitored anesthesia care
(MAC) by using an audiometer and BIS monitor.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty
unpremedicated patients were scheduled two times for nasal or dental procedures
at an interval of two or three days. In a randomized, cross-over study design,
we prospectively compared the BIS values according to the loudness of OR noise
in two different depths of sedation during MAC. Propofol target controlled
infusion (TCI) was started at a propofol target concentration (CT)
2.0 mg/ml using a DiprifusorÔ with flash mode until a BIS 80 and/or a
Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAAS) score of 4 (group 1), and
BIS 75 and/or a OAAS score 3 (group 2) was obtained. We evaluated the effect
site concentrations and the elapsed time and checked the BIS at 50, 80, 110,
and 120 dB of sound pressure level (SPL) in both groups.
Results: In contrast to the group 2, the BIS values at 80, 110 and 120 dB in the
group 1 were significantly increased compared to the value at 50 dB in the same
group (P < 0.05)(Fig.1).

Fig. 1: Effect of background noise
on bispectral (BIS) values in the two propofol sedation groups: ■ = Group 1 and ■ = Group 2. * = P<0.05 compared to BIS at 50 dB
and †= P<0.05 compared to BIS at 80 dB.
Conclusions: The loud OR background noise
might interfere with induction of sedation to a degree, which was more
noticeable on light to moderate sedation than for deep sedation.