How
To Educate Total Intravenous Anesthesia To The
Trainees Who Have Never Experienced Anesthesia Management; An Importance Of
Imprinting Effect
Yoshimi
Inagaki, MD, PhD., Hiroshi Adachi, MD, Yuichi Ishibe, MD, PhD.
Department
of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of
Medicine, Yonago, Tottori 683-8504, Japan
Introduction:
The more total
intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using target-controlled infusion (TCI) technique
has been applied in the clinical anesthesia, the more opportunities also have
increased to teach this technique to the trainees. However, there are few
reports on education of TIVA using TCI for the beginners (1). We conducted a
prospective randomized study to clarify whether an initial training program
affect the choice of anesthesia method in the trainees.
Methods:
After obtaining
approval of IRB, forty-five trainees, who have never experienced anesthesia
management, were enrolled to this study between July 2002 and February 2004.
The trainees were randomly assigned to the two study groups according to
the month in which they started the program; trainees in an inhalation
anesthesia (IA) group (n=25) learned general anesthesia with either sevoflurane
or isoflurane and fentanyl for the first month and TIVA with propofol and
fentanyl using TCI technique for the second month, and chose either anesthesia
method freely in consideration of patient’s profile at the third month;
trainees in an TIVA group (n=20) learned both anesthetic methods in the reversed
manner for two months and chose freely at the third month. Eight instructors
taught both anesthesia methods using the same educational standard throughout
the study. At the end of the third month, the trainees were asked with a
questionnaire that involved number of cases undergoing each anesthesia technique
in the third month, clinical applicability of TIVA (1[very difficult] to 5 [very
easy]), necessity of BIS monitoring (1[absolutely unnecessary] to 5 [absolutely
necessary]), and so on. Eight
instructors also were asked the degree of achievement of each anesthesia
technique in all trainees at the end of the third month (1 [poor] to 5
[excellent]). Data was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test and Chi-square test.
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
At the third
month, a ratio of patients undergoing TIVA with TCI technique to all patients
undergoing general anesthesia with/without regional anesthesia was 0.362
(192/530) in the inhalation group and 0.516 (265/514) in the TIVA group,
respectively. Percentage of choice of TIVA was significantly more (p<0.0001)
in the TIVA group. The clinical applicability of TIVA in the TIVA group was 3
(2-4) (median [25 percentile to 75 percentile]) without regional anesthesia and
3.5 (3-4) with regional anesthesia, while that in the IA group was 2 (2-3) and 3
(3-3), respectively. Impression of TIVA was significantly better (p=0.0215
without regional anesthesia and p=0.0166 with regional anesthesia) in the TIVA
group. Necessity of BIS monitoring
was significantly lower (p=0.0182) in the TIVA group (3 [2.5-4]) than in the IA
group (4 [3-4]) when they administered TIVA but was similar when they
administered volatile anesthetic. The instructors rated the trainees of the TIVA
group (3 [3-4]) significantly higher (p=0.0278) than those of the IA group (3
[2-3]) about the achievement of TIVA skill.
Discussion:
The results
indicated that an initial training program of anesthesia played an important
role in the choice of anesthesia method for the trainees who have never
experienced anesthetic management. TIVA skill would not be familiar for the
trainees receiving an inhalation anesthesia technique initially. However,
clinical applicability of TIVA was higher in the trainees first receiving TIVA
training program. This finding may be provided by the imprinting effect on the
trainees.
Conclusion:
An initial
training program of anesthesia was likely to affect strongly the choice of
anesthesia method in the following training period.
Reference:
1. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2001; 20:228-45.