Neostigmine and  alpha-2 agonists as additives for neuraxial blockade

a.o.Univ.Prof.Dr.Astrid Chiari

University of Vienna, Austria

 

Transmission of pain from peripheral tissues to higher centres in the brain is modulated in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Incoming messages can be enhanced or attenuated by various transmitters derived from either primary afferent A delta and C fibers, interneurons or descending bulbospinal fibers. After noxious stimulation, excitatory neurotransmitters are released from afferent fibers. Compensatory inhibitory neurotransmitters include (besides many others): norepinephrine and acetylcholine. Thus, an interplay between excitatory and inhibitory spinal neuronal systems will determine the message delivered to higher levels of the central nervous system. Increased understanding in spinal processing of pain has lead to development of specific drugs that inhibit pain transmission without motor blockade. This review describes the experimental background and the clinical use of neuraxial alpha-2-adrenergic agonists and neostigmine administered alone or with other drugs.

Pain and systemic opioids trigger the release of endogenous norepinephrine (NE) from bulbospinal descending neurons, which in turn stimulates postsynaptic alpha 2 adrenoceptors in the spinal cord to produce analgesia. Intrathecal injection of the alpha 2 adrenergic agonist, clonidine, mimics this effect of NE and produces analgesia in animals and humans. Spinal alpha 2 adrenergic mediated antinociception also involves a cholinergic interaction, since administration of clonidine results in increased acetylcholine concentration in sheep and in humans.1 Clonidine was proven to have a higher analgesic potency after neuraxial than after systemic administration and in volunteers, a concentration of clonidine in CSF producing a 95% maximal analgesia to a noxious stimulus in the lower extremity (130 ng/ml) has been established.2

Stimulation of postsynaptic alpha 2 adrenoceptors in the brainstem and in the intermediolateral column of the spinal cord decreases sympathetic outflow, which causes bothersome side effects, primarily hypotension and bradycardia. Sedation has also been observed with the administration of alpha 2 adrenergic agonists, due to actions in the locus coeruleus. In contrast, neuraxial clonidine has not been associated with respiratory depression or motor blockade.3

Administered intrathecally by itself, clonidine fails to produce reliable surgical anesthesia despite a high dose (450 µg). In contrast, intrathecal clonidine (150-450 µg) provides dose dependent postoperative analgesia for women following caesarean section4, lasting up to 14 hours, but associated with severe intense sedation and hemodynamic depression. 50-200 µg spinally injected clonidine have been successfully used as the sole analgesic during first stage of labor, although the larger doses were accompanied by hypotension.5 Synergistic interactions between spinal alpha 2 adrenergic agonists and opioids have been observed in rodents, but this does not seem to be also true in humans. The ED 50 of epidural clonidine in postoperative analgesia is markedly reduced in humans when combined with fentanyl , but this interaction is only additive, not synergistic. When sufentanil and clonidine are combined spinally during labor in small as well as in large doses, duration of analgesia is prolonged, but the incidence of hypotension limits the clinical usefulness in this setting.6

Epidural clonidine by itself produces dose-dependent intra- and postoperative analgesia and has been successfully used as the sole analgesic agent during and after major abdominal surgery, where it provided more efficient postoperative analgesia than epidural bupivacaine.7

In clinical practice, however, intrathecal or epidural clonidine is mostly administered in conjunction with local anesthetics. Addition of 150 µg clonidine to spinal or epidural bupivacaine improves the quality and increases the duration of  postoperative and obstetric analgesia.3 When clonidine is added to local anesthetics, a decrease in blood pressure 20% off baseline must be expected due to the additional sympathetic blockade caused even by small doses of clonidine. Whereas the addition of large doses of clonidine (75-150 µg) to spinal local anesthetics reduces heart rate and blood pressure8, small doses of clonidine (15 µg) combined with intrathecal  ropivacaine did not show such side effects while producing anesthesia suitable for ambulatory surgery.

Clonidine 1-2 µg/kg has been added to caudal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for pediatric hernia repair and increased duration of analgesia, but recent reports of respiratory depression question its safety in preterm infants.

Since intrathecal alpha 2 adrenergic agonists produce analgesia through a different mechanism than intrathecal opioids, patients suffering from chronic pain tolerant to opioids can be provided with analgesia by neuraxial alpha 2 adrenergic agonists alone or combined with opioids. Especially neuropathic pain can be treated very effectively with spinal and epidural clonidine due to a different physiology in the spinal cord in these pain states. However, published experience with this small group of patients is too limited to give common dose recommendations.

Spinal alpha 2 adrenergic receptor activation - either through endogenous NE or spinally administered clonidine - involves  spinal cholinergic pathways and transmitters to produce analgesia.1 Spinally administered neostigmine causes analgesia in animals and humans by preventing the breakdown of synaptically released acetylcholine, which acts on muscarinic and also nicotinc receptors in the spinal cord. Neostigmine is a quaternary amine, unable to cross the blood-brain barrier and therefore has to be administered spinally in order to reach the target organ, the spinal cord.

When injected intrathecally in volunteers, neostigmine produces dose dependent analgesia but also severe nausea and vomiting, probably due to cephalad spread and action in the brainstem.9 This side effect can be reduced by injecting the drug in a hyperbaric solution and keeping the head of the bed elevated. Since alpha adrenergic agonists and neostigmine act through the same mechanism, additive analgesic enhancement has been observed with the combination of intrathecal neostigmine and epidural clonidine in volunteers. In addition, neostigmine increases sympathetic outflow, thus counteracting the hypotension of i.t. local anesthetics and clonidine.

In a volunteer study, the addition of 6.25-50 µg neostigmine to spinal bupivacaine revealed a high incidence in nausea and vomiting and a delayed recovery from anesthesia.10 In the clinical setting, intrathecal neostigmine (25-75µg) coadministerd with bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia revealed a dose-independent reduction in postoperative rescue analgesic consumption, but also a dose-independent increase in the need for antiemetic treatment.11 In obstetrics, intrathecal neostigmine (5-20 µg) alone failed to show any analgesic effect by itself, but it increased the analgesia from i.t. sufentanil.

These studies suggest that intrathecal neostigmine alone is unlikely to produce complete postoperative or labor analgesia but it might become a future adjunctive spinal analgesic in very small doses.

 

Literature:

  1. Klimscha W, Tong C, Eisenach JC: Intrathecal alpha 2-adrenergic agonists stimulate acetylcholine and norepinephrine release from the spinal cord dorsal horn in sheep. An in vivo microdialysis study. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:110-6
  2. Eisenach JC, Hood DD, Tuttle R, Shafer S, Smith T, Tong C: Computer-controlled epidural infusion to targeted cerebrospinal fluid concentrations in humans. Clonidine. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:33-47
  3. Eisenach JC, De Kock M, Klimscha W: Alpha2-adrenergic agonists for regional anesthesia. A clinical review of clonidine (1984-1995). Anesthesiology 1996; 85:655-74
  4. Filos KS, Goudas LC, Patroni O, Polyzou V: Hemodynamic and analgesic profile after intrathecal clonidine in humans. A dose-response study. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 591-601
  5. Chiari A, Lorber C, Eisenach JC, Wildling E, Krenn C, Zavrsky A, Kainz C, Germann P, Klimscha W: Analgesic and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal clonidine as the sole analgesic agent during first stage of labor: A dose-response study. Anesthesiology 1999; 91:388-96.
  6. Mercier FJ, Dounas M, Bouaziz H, Des Mesnards-Smaja V, Foiret C, Vestermann MN, Fischler M, Benhamou D: The effect of adding a minidose of clonidine to intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:894-601
  7. De Kock M, Gautier P, Pavlopoulou A, Jonniaux M, Lavand’homme P: Epidural clonidine or bupivacaine as the sole analgesic agent during and after abdominal surgery: a comparative study. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1354-62
  8. Larsen B, Dorscheid E, Macher-Hanselmann F, Buch U: Does intrathecal clonidine prolong the effect of spinal anesthesia with spinal mepivacaine? A randomized double-blind study. Der Anästhesist 1998; 47:741-6
  9. Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Tuttle R: Phase I safety assessment of intrathecal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:331-43
  10. Liu SS, Hodgson PS, Moore JM, Trautman WJ, Burkhead DL: Dose-response effects of spinal neostigmine added to bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in volunteers. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:710-7
  11. Lauretti GR, Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Pfeifer BL: A multi-center study of intrathecal neostigmine for analgesia following vaginal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:913-8.