Prediction Error of a Marsh’s Pharmacokinetic Parameter Set for
Propofol TCI in Korean
Ho-Yeong Kil,
M.D., Seung Joon Lee, M.D., Sang Ki Min, M.D.*
Department of
Anesthesiology, Hallym University Hospital, Ajou University Hospital*, Seoul,
South Korea
Background: Marsh`s
pharmacokinetic parameter set is most widely used for target controlled
infusion for propofol. However, Marsh`s model was derived from European
population, and it is uncertain whether this model is adequate for oriental,
especially korean.
Methods: Aftert IRB
approval and ethical committee, informed consent was obtained from thirty ASA 1
adult patients who underwent minor orthopedic surgery. Atropine 0.5 mg was
injected as premedication. ECG, pulse oximeter, radial artery cannulation for blood
sampling and checking vital sign, IV line for drug infusion was prepared. All
patients were received general anesthesia with propofol TCI(Mater TCI)
supplemented by 67% N20 and 33% 02. Initial target of propofol was 6 mcg/ml and
maintained around 4-6 mcg/ml according to bispectral index(40-50). In the
middle of surgery, target concentration was increased to 6 mcg/ml and
maintained until effect concentration was reached to same concentration. Three
min after equilibration, blood sample was drawn from radial artery(3 ml) for
estimation of concentration using HPLC. Target concentration was decreased
gradually at the interval of 1 mcg/ml until end of surgery and blood sample was
drawn as above mentioned method. Samples of 1-6 mcg/ml were compared with control
sample value which was drawn before drug injection. Prediction error(%) was
obtained from following formula: measured conc.-predicted conc./predicted
conc.x100.
Results: Prediction errors at each concentration were as
follows:
|
Target conc.(mcg/ml) |
Measured Conc.(mcg/ml) |
Prediction Error(%) |
|
1 |
0.98+/-0.42 |
-2 |
|
2 |
1.85+/-0.56 |
-7.5 |
|
3 |
3.05+/-0.73 |
1.7 |
|
4 |
4.62+/-0.98 |
15.5 |
|
5 |
5.81+/-1.23 |
16.2 |
|
6 |
7.22+/-1.32 |
20.3 |
Conclusions: Prediction errors of propofol concentration derived
from Marsh model were less than 25% in the concentration range of 1-6 mcg/ml,
which was considered as usual concentration for clinical practice.